Container for inclusive productions

[Juergen Reuter]

Since this is a sine qua non for SUSY event sample productions, this is high-priority. (I even consider it more urgent than the 2->1 processes). But it depends on #468.

[kilian]

Sinced this depends on #468, the priority is obviously lower than that one.

[Juergen Reuter]

This is actually on the verge to come, and we clarified the syntax now:

    p, p => (proc1) + (proc2) + ....

for process containers, and

   p, p => ("W+" => E1, n1), j, j  

etc. for decays (also shuffled:

   p, p => (t => (W+ => E1, n1), b), tbar

).

[Juergen Reuter]

Medium to major change in syntax - maybe already ready for 2.2.0? tbc on Monday...

[kilian]

Decays are now in separate ticket #629. Inclusive processes (addition) to be prepared for release 2.2.0.

[kilian]

Status 04-04: algebra for inclusive processes implemented, got the usual gfortran 4.7 memory corruption :( To be ctd.

[kilian]

Intermediate status as of r5682: everything seems to work for processes with a sum of final states, such as

e1, E1 => (e2, E2) + (e3, E3) + (A, A)

The case where the program has to expand the final state

e1, E1 => e2 + e3 + A, E2 + E3 + A

doesn't work yet because the r.h.s. will contain components with vanishing matrix element. This is not yet handled correctly.

Then, the expansion may contain doublers; these should be eliminated before starting integration. (E.g., by sorting the r.h.s.)

[kilian]

Remaining issues done in r5688, closing.