Opened 14 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#381 closed task (fixed)
Implement the BLHA interface to NLO codes
| Reported by: | Christian Speckner | Owned by: | jr_reuter, weiss |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | P2 | Milestone: | v2.3.0 |
| Component: | core | Version: | 2.0.3 |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: |
Description
Implement a version of the BLHA interface as described in arXiv:1001.1307.
Change History (13)
comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by
| Status: | new → assigned |
|---|
comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by
| Milestone: | v2.0.5 → v2.1.0 |
|---|
comment:3 Changed 14 years ago by
| Type: | defect → task |
|---|
comment:4 Changed 14 years ago by
comment:5 Changed 13 years ago by
| Milestone: | v2.2.0 → v2.1.0 |
|---|
I think that is now also approaching, moving to 2.1.0
comment:6 Changed 13 years ago by
I appreciate your faith in my skills, but 2.1.0 is not realistic. I plan to eventually merge this together with the dipoles (it is not really useful without a subtraction scheme anyway) once both items are in a usable state and tested. Mid-2012 is somewhat realistic, but don't cross your fingers for anything earlier ;)
comment:7 Changed 13 years ago by
| Milestone: | v2.1.0 → v2.2.0 |
|---|
comment:8 Changed 11 years ago by
| Milestone: | v2.3.1 → v2.3.0 |
|---|---|
| Owner: | changed from Christian Speckner to jr_reuter, weiss |
| Priority: | P3 → P2 |
| Status: | assigned → new |
This has become more pressing. Question to everybody: Do we take over the existing code and improve, or write new from scratch? As the code clearly should use the syntax_rules, lexer, parser, ifile setup, a newly written solution might not look soooo different!?
comment:9 Changed 11 years ago by
As of r5243, the BLHA interface implementation of CS is compiled again. Tests not yet transferred to unit tests, not run yet, and interface not yet functional.
comment:10 Changed 11 years ago by
Has become part of #646, will probably be done in the new context.
comment:13 Changed 10 years ago by
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
According to CW, this is done for the moment. If some issues appear (e.g. with EW corrections) we can add another ticket. Closing.
BTW, what exactly is the status of that one here?